What's with these comments?

The Telegraph allows comments on stories because we believe there are readers who have something to say that others might find enlightening or interesting. We expected some misuse of the comment feature, because editors at other newspapers that allow comments told us as much. The comment function at newspapers has prompted hateful, profane, racist, illogical and off-point posts. People write things to which they won't dare sign their names.

With comments, a newspaper is bound to get the good with the bad. The hope, of course, is that the good will outweigh the bad.

Still I have been disappointed, even discouraged, at the level of discourse in some cases.

A “report a violation” link in the comments section allows readers to alert us to offensive material. But because we don't have the staff to moderate the discussions, we're expecting soon to require registration for those who want to comment. It won't stop all the violations - anonymous commentators can be crafty -- but it should help.

Anonymity has its place. There are many wrongs that wouldn't have come to light without an anonymous tip or unsigned letter. But folks who make personal and often vicious attacks behind the shield of anonymity may need to find another medium through which to express themselves.
Of course, controversial comments will always be allowed. Our goal is not to stop the expression of unpopular views. Some comments will sting, or anger, but they may also prompt positive action or a solution.

The comment function on macon.com is really about creating a space that allows readers to have a conversation, or even a debate, about the people, events and issues we write about, and it’s about providing a forum in which readers can question how we report the news.

Those of you who are offering thoughtful, helpful, and interesting comments, as well as story ideas and even criticism, we hope you will not let your voices be silenced by those seeking to cause a distraction. That would be a sad commentary indeed.